AI Act Risk Classifier

# AI Act Risk Assessment: AI candidate screening workflow

Risk category: High Risk
Signal strength: 79% (indicative, based only on the answers provided — not a legal determination)

## Reasoning
- High-risk signal: employment or worker-management decisions.
- High-risk signal: candidate scoring or recruitment ranking.
- High-risk signal: automated decision-making with material impact.

## Applicable obligations
- Maintain risk-management and quality controls for the AI system.
- Keep technical documentation and instructions for use current.
- Enable logging, monitoring, and post-market review.
- Define effective human oversight before consequential action.
- Track data governance, accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity controls.

## Required controls
- Human oversight required
- Logging required
- Documentation required
- Monitoring required
- Legal review required

## Recommendations
- Add approval gates before consequential actions.
- Generate technical documentation and DPIA/FRA working papers.
- Record model, data-source, owner, reviewer, and review cadence.
- Monitor post-deployment outcomes and override actions.

This is a governance support assessment, not legal advice. Final classification and obligations should be reviewed by qualified legal and compliance owners.